Abstract Panel

Panel Details


 NameAffiliationCountry
Convenor Dr. Ankur Datta South Asian University India
Co-convenor Dr. Stavroula Pipyrou University of St. Andrews United Kingdom
Panel No : P038
Title : Categories of Violence and Suffering in the early 21st Century: An anthropology of victims, perpetrators and those in between
Short Abstract : This panel explores how victimhood and perpetrators are produced in response to crises, ranging from events of mass violence and conflict, to periods of suffering induced by socio-economic and political structures in the 21st Century so far. The panel will examine anthropologically how these categories are recognised or misrecognised, and the role of institutions such as the state, law, mass media and religion in shaping experiences of violence and suffering for people across different contexts.
Long Abstract :

The study of violence and suffering and the subject positions of the victim, perpetrator and witnesses have long been of interest for anthropologists. This panel will explore how these subject positions are constructed in contemporary life in different situations, or produced in response to various forms of crises, ranging from events of mass violence and conflict, war, to periods of suffering induced by socio-economic and political structures. The early 21st century is a period of interest, beginning with the war on terror, the economic crisis of 2008 and after, mass displacements from civil wars, the rise of populism, state violence, the cost of living crisis and the covid-19 pandemic, to name a few moments. The framing of victimhood in such situations has become difficult especially when categories are not easily recognised in everyday life. A victim of violence in a riot may be arrested as a perpetrator of violence. Populist majoritarian politics is premised on a ‘claim’ of suffering. Populations at the socio economic margins are presented as ‘undeserving’ of welfare. Refugees seeking sanctuary are seen as threats by nation-states. What kind of experiences are produced when the categories with which subject positions are either misrecognised or whose recognition reflect uncertainty? What is the role played by institutions such as the state, the law, mass media and religion in shaping those experiences, and the recognition of those experiences, thereby affecting the framing of victims and perpetrators? Who remains a victim as a subject of anthropological inquiry? This panel invites papers based on anthropological reflection and ethnographic work that will look into these questions.