Abstract Panel


Authors Information
SequenceTypeName TitleFirst NameLast NameDepartmentInstitute / Affiliation
1 Author Ms. Anwesha Konar Research Policy and Development Advisory Group
Abstract Information
TrackID
:
IUAES23_ABS_C4396
Abstract Theme
:
P085 - Migration and Rights in Urbanization Processes
Abstract Title
:
“Who cares”? : Inter-state Migrants in the Construction Industry and their Right to Social Reproduction in City spaces
Short Abstract
:
In contemporary India urbanization is being largely fueled by the construction sector .The Jharkhand Migration Survey has revealed that 40% of Jharkhand’s cyclical-migrants across social categories are engaged in the multi-layered construction sector. Thus, drawing upon ethnographic observations from JMS about cyclical migrant-workers in the construction sector the paper highlights “the right to care” of inter-state migrants in the cityspaces as an integral yet ignored domain of labor rights and various negotiations such ignorance engenders.
Long Abstract
:

In contemporary India rapid urbanization is being largely fueled by the construction sector through the creation of infrastructure, amenities, residential and non-residential complexes. Simultaneously, the construction industry is one of the major employers of the informal, inter-state cyclical migrants in India. The recently conducted Jharkhand Migration Survey reveals that around 40% of Jharkhand’s cyclical-migrants across social categories are engaged in the multi-layered construction sector, which functions through multiple subcontracting relationships. Drawing upon ethnographic observations about cyclical migrant-workers in the construction sector the paper highlights “the right to care” of inter-state migrants in the cityspaces as an integral yet ignored domain of labor rights. The responsibility of care and social reproduction within the sector is borne neither by the employer, the state or the city council. Further, conditions of domicility limit the access of migrants to available social security measures at the destination. Consequently the migrant’s right to care remains unrecognized and the responsibility is delegated to the migrant subject. The degree of care labor delegated is directly dependent on the social location inhabited, the social capital accrued  and the contractual arrangements negotiated by the migrant.

Previous scholarships  have  argued that migration is sustained through the economy of care back at the source. Supplementing this argument the paper argues that economy of care is also re-produced at the destination in the form of non-conventional, contingent commensalities constituted by peer groups of workers. Given the general absence of care rights these non-normative domesticities become crucial for the immediate social-reproduction, resilience and survival of migrant laborers at the destination. In effect, then the absence of a homogenous set of caring rights as an integral part of labor rights entrenches existing social cleavages of class, caste, age, gender, ethnicity and sustains the vulnerabilities embedded within life experiences of migrants belonging to  marginalized social stratas.

 

Abstract Keywords
:
Inter-state migrants, Construction Industry, Social Reproduction